Edition 2 · 3 November 2026 · Fortnightly AGN Power 10
The Crusaders remain the standard, but below the established leaders the battle for national recognition is becoming more compelling.
See the complete latest rankings and ratings →
Australian American football has never lacked passionate clubs, fierce rivalries or talented players. What it has lacked is a consistent way to compare them nationally. From Melbourne to Brisbane, Sydney to Perth, teams spend much of their seasons competing within their own state competitions, with relatively few opportunities to discover how they measure up against the best elsewhere in the country.
That is the challenge the AGN Power 10 was created to address. And two editions into the rankings, an interesting picture is beginning to emerge.
The Western Crusaders remain the standard. Brisbane Rhinos continue to lead the chasing pack. UTS Gators and Eastern Razorbacks have held their positions among the country’s leading teams. Yet below that established group, the competition for national recognition is becoming considerably more interesting.
Vincent City Ducks have forced their way into the rankings at No. 6, introducing another Western Australian contender into the national conversation. UNSW Raiders have climbed into the top five, while UC Stars — statistically the second-strongest team in the latest assessment — find themselves ranked seventh overall.
Winning games matters. Winning convincingly matters. But when clubs operate in different competitions, against different opponents, with limited interstate fixtures, determining who is genuinely stronger requires more than reading a league ladder.
The latest Power 10 incorporates results through 1 November, combining 60 per cent statistical performance with 40 per cent independent editorial assessment. The outcome is not a definitive declaration of which team would win on any given Saturday. It is an evidence-based assessment of where Australia’s eligible senior men’s clubs stand right now.
The standard has been set. Who can meet it?
The Western Crusaders have occupied the top position in both editions of the AGN Power 10, and their latest rating of 88.48 gives them a meaningful advantage over the rest of the country. Brisbane remains second, ten rating points behind, while UTS Gators and Eastern Razorbacks occupy third and fourth respectively.
The reported 26–14 Southern Cross Bowl result against UNSW Raiders is especially relevant to the national conversation. Unlike a routine domestic fixture, an interstate matchup provides a rare opportunity to examine how teams from different competitions perform against one another. But a national ranking is not proof that any club would defeat every opponent: Australia’s state competitions follow different schedules, and opportunities for direct comparison remain limited.
That does not diminish what the Crusaders have achieved. Their combination of results, scoring performance and editorial recognition makes them the clear No. 1 under the current model. The burden now falls on the chasing pack to assemble a stronger case.
Brisbane’s response has been emphatic. The Rhinos’ reported 41–0 victory adds another shutout to their record and places them comfortably ahead of the next group. Yet one unanswered question remains: how would Brisbane fare against the other leading clubs? Domestic dominance establishes credentials, but interstate meetings would offer stronger evidence of where those credentials sit nationally.
UTS Gators remain third after a reported 42–0 result against Sydney University, while Eastern Razorbacks hold fourth following a reported 26–7 win over Adelaide University. Both have a strong case, and the gap between them is just 4.73 points. UNSW Raiders, meanwhile, rise from sixth to fifth despite their reported defeat to the Crusaders — a reminder that the Power 10 considers the breadth of a season, not just one result.
Western Australia is becoming impossible to ignore
If the top of the rankings tells a story of established strength, Western Australia provides the most intriguing new development. Vincent City Ducks enter at No. 6 after missing the inaugural edition, and their entry reinforces a simple principle: every eligible team should have a pathway into national consideration through its results.
The Ducks opened with a 26–12 victory over Claremont Jets and then shut out Curtin Saints 30–0. West Coast Wolverines had also made a strong start, defeating Swan City Titans 26–22, Curtin 56–10 and Claremont 18–0. Both unbeaten records made their 31 October meeting one of the most anticipated early-season clashes in the west.
The fixture did not deliver the full contest supporters hoped for. AGN’s working result records a shortened game with Vincent City ahead 7–0 when play ended. Its administrative classification and treatment in the national statistical ledger require careful distinction from the result of a completed match. Vincent City’s earlier victories still deserve recognition, just as West Coast’s opening performances should not be erased by the unusual circumstances of a single fixture.
Western Australia now has two clubs in the Top 10, and the Ducks’ emergence offers more than a local rivalry. It shows why the national list must consider the entire eligible field rather than simply shuffle the previous ten. A team should be able to force its way into the conversation by what it does on the field.
The UC Stars and the limits of statistics
Of all the movements in this edition, none invites more discussion than the UC Stars. The ACT club falls from fifth to seventh despite a statistical performance score of 76.93, second only to Western Crusaders. A reported 62–14 victory strengthens a record that looks exceptionally strong when considered through the statistical component alone.
So why seventh? The distinction lies in the Power 10’s 60/40 model. Winning percentage and scoring margin measure what a team has achieved, but they cannot completely answer how a club would perform against unfamiliar opposition from another state. Independent editorial assessment introduces a separate judgement about competitive context, and for the Stars it has produced a noticeably different result.
That discrepancy should invite examination, not dismissal of either the team or the numbers. Early in the season, small samples and limited interstate matches leave substantial uncertainty. The Stars’ statistical record demands respect; their national position remains a live question that further games can help answer.
The responsibility also sits with the rankings themselves. Where statistical and editorial perspectives diverge sharply, AGN should make that tension visible, continue testing the evidence and be prepared to change its conclusions as stronger information arrives.
The competition does not end at tenth
Elsewhere, Melton Wolves rise from ninth to eighth, while West Coast Wolverines slip to ninth and Western Crusaders II complete the list at No. 10. Second teams are eligible under the same rules as any other senior team; their place is earned through results, not inherited from their organisation.
Just outside the ten, Bayside Ravens drop from tenth to eleventh. Monash Warriors and Geelong Buccaneers also attracted editorial consideration. The distinction between being listed and being left out can be narrow, which is why every eligible team must be assessed statistically before the final national ranking is produced.
This is not a closed group. A club outside the Power 10 does not have to wait for a nomination to be noticed; its results should already contribute to the same framework used for the leading teams.
More than a ranking
Two editions into the Power 10, Western Crusaders remain the benchmark and Brisbane the closest challenger. UTS Gators and Eastern Razorbacks hold their positions, UNSW Raiders rise and Vincent City Ducks arrive. UC Stars offer a reminder that a national table can clarify a debate without ending it.
Australia’s gridiron landscape is too geographically spread and competitively varied for a single ranking to settle every argument. Nor should that be the objective. The Power 10 exists to give those arguments a consistent foundation, recognise performances wherever they occur, and bring greater attention to clubs competing beyond their immediate state boundaries.
As results accumulate, teams will rise and fall. New contenders will emerge and reputations will be tested. For now the Western Crusaders sit above the field — but a national ranking is only as interesting as the clubs determined to challenge it.
About the AGN Power 10. AGN independently ranks eligible Australian senior men’s American football teams using 60% statistical performance — including win rate, adjusted margins, strength of schedule and quality victories — and 40% independent editorial assessment. A minimum of two scored games is required for statistical eligibility. These are comparative ratings, not predictions of head-to-head outcomes or official American Football Australia rankings. Reported results remain subject to source corrections.